Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SirRealist who wrote (14301)	12/20/2001 11:48:46 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

America has a tradition and history of supporting(and in some instances installing in power) mass murderers and turning a blind eye when it is deemed in America's interest<Snip> .....American policy in this area is hypocritical, shameful and disgusting. <<< teevee Presumably, acting against America's perceived interests is more honorable. Absolutely, desireable and critical to a free world. But its purpose and effectiveness would leave something to be desired. Wrong. Other nations, singly or collectively in unions such as the European Union, and their corporations will, from time to time, be leaders in their fields-more productive, efficient etc which naturally leads to stronger economies, highr standards of living and more capability to fund its military and defense etc. I'm sure even some politicians have cringed when FP attempts proved bloody embarrassments. Too few Yet pursuing America's best interests should always remain the central aim, even if the policies backfire. Surely there are ethical limits or are you willing to turn a blind eye to genocide in America's best interests? When a FP choice is between two evils, one can't simply refuse them both and walk away. Since when do two wrongs make a right? There are alternatives, like arresting mass murderers and putting them on trial in the Hague.