SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (5328)12/20/2001 11:43:43 PM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
sure did hurt John D., that tight capital market...



To: John Pitera who wrote (5328)12/21/2001 3:21:39 AM
From: macavity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
I do not disagree.

My view is that bondholders have to take responsibility for their investments. The contract is between issuer and holder. As always the world governments will use tax-payers money to sort out this mess.
The country cannot pay the interest, forget the principal. There is no difference between buying eToys in Mar2000, and buying bonds from a sovereign state that has this sort of cashflow problems. The difference is people 'believe' that things will be done to get Argentina out of it, the free put option. They are probably right.

I would just wish that the Powers That Be would let people suffer the consequences of their actions, whether they buy dot-bomb stocks or give money to entities that have no means of paying it.

- macavity.



To: John Pitera who wrote (5328)12/21/2001 9:57:46 AM
From: Sweet Ol  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
John, you have your dates wrong. Rockefeller didn't start Std Oil in the 1960's, it was more like the 1860's. Although, I think most of his action occurred in the early 1900's. They broke up his company in the 1930's. I think it was Roosevelt's trust busters.

The point is still well taken.

Best to all,

JRH