Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (6073)	1/4/2002 7:27:35 PM
From: Roebear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

mishedlo, I like GOLD for trading also, btw, there is a similar one that is undiscovered, albeit of a paler luster. I'll let you guess at that one. Shouldn't be hard, there aren't that many. I made the statement on SAII that gold would breakthrough 300 in 2002 and hold above that level, for the first time since late 1997, I guess I should bring my home thread up to date: Message 16856186 You see, for just one thing, if they (they = CB's of the world) could have smashed the Price of Gold, they would have done it in November/December. Since they did not, they cannot, and so they will not. Like the IMF and Argentina, the range of possible positive outcomes is running to nil and IMF Santa's Bag is running out of gifts to support losing causes, with only clunkers of coal left on the bottom. Suppressing gold is one of those losing causes, with the reward side of the equation soon falling to nada. I could give more reasons and more clarity, but choose not to do so, as I am only at about 60% of my sector positions. JMHO, Roebear