SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fingolfen who wrote (154171)1/7/2002 4:30:19 PM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
fingolfen, if INTC is going for 90nm in 2003 and AMD is going to be out in .13 in late 2002 why doesn't AMD just go for 90nm directly? Am I missing something?

C



To: fingolfen who wrote (154171)1/7/2002 8:07:44 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"I also don't see AMD getting much past 1.8GHz on a bulk 0.13 micron process (hence the reason they're forced to move to SOI)."

Switch to a whole new process and get about 100-133 Mhz?
You sure about that? If so AMD really has to get to hammer..
No wonder AMD is milking .18u forever.
How do they always snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?

Maybe they should just skip to .10u?

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News