Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (215752)	1/8/2002 7:20:11 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I believe that prohibtion on cruel and unusual punishment pertains to sentencing guidelines. More than guidelines. To what can be done to them after conviction and sentencing. They can be put to death for capital crimes but they can't, for example, be crucified- -a slow a painful death. Criminals are not sentenced to the rack. It was an "interrogation" technique. People did die on the rack, so it could be used to execute a death penalty. we let them go in exchange for information. I oppose that, as well. True. I have mixed feelings. Ideally it would be used to get the little fish to help convict the big ones. some kind of non invasive procedure could be used to extract information. Such as? Is that a euphemism for torture? Because if so, it would appear to violate the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause.