Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (154361)	1/8/2002 7:30:52 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"Quantispeed, on the other hand, is a half a$$ed way of making up for poor marketing on AMD's part. Instead of dispelling the notion that megahertz alone does not equal performance, AMD offers the end user a new number, which doesn't have a concrete way of being measured, and which has no direct comparison to other micro-architectures, allowing the number to be chosen quite arbitrarily" Ok smart guy. If you were Intel and you're best chip ran 500 Mhz less than a AMD just how would you market that? Less is more? Gimmie "more" anytime. Let "less" try to figure a way to market it. Jim

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (154361)	1/8/2002 7:49:47 PM
From: Charles Gryba	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

wbmw, if the P3 at 1.4 is way faster than most higher clocked P4s then AMD's claims that the P4 has devalued the Mhz will be validated by Intel itself. C