Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (154537)	1/9/2002 5:28:59 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Wonderful Winnie, Re: "K8 delays are pretty mild compared to the 10-odd years the Itanic has taken to get to the point of shipping 500 systems a year." I was trying to find more information on Hammer, and I came up with all these wonderful sites explaining AMD's new architecture. Tell me which one you like the best. hammer.com k8.com clawhammer.com sledgehammer.com x86-64.com wbmw

To: Win Smith who wrote (154537)	1/9/2002 7:29:14 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

K8 delays are pretty mild compared to the 10-odd years the Itanic has taken to get to the point of shipping 500 systems a year. Just keep spewing it, though, wanna, that's your job. Slight difference. AMD is betting the company, again, on one chip, hammer this time. Itanium, on the other hand, is not absolutely essential to the immediate future of Intel. The sands of time are AMD's biggest enemy right now because it's 2002 and no tent celebration yet for hammer tapeout.