Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A CANADIAN DIAMOND HUNT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WillP who wrote (587)	1/10/2002 2:13:57 AM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 930

Hello Will Thanks, I really didn't want to spend six hours researching and writing a response to this... conspiracy theory. Lets listen to the facts and see what the next batch of Lakefield numbers look like? For my money however, in a savana dotted with s..t p…s and small game Jackson Inlet has the potential of being an elephant, and while management wants to retain 100% ownership, it takes $$$ to put a diamond mine into production. In that respect, as the numbers become clear and should they prove increasingly attractive, you have to know who's gonna come a courting... In my view, the risk at these levels is worth the potential +/-1,000% reward of say Snap share values… or better? The following offers a glimpse at some very interesting numbers now being achieved (Aug 2001) and projected from Slave Craton kimberlites: nnsl.com The last line I thought was worth pointing out. Can TWG match or exceed any of these?… time will tell. In the mean time: binaryinc.org Regards Vaughn