SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mephisto who wrote (104)1/11/2002 2:57:24 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5185
 
I agree with that. Many people made a great deal of money in it, too.

Where we might disagree is that I don't think the pension issue is central; lots of Enron employees did very well, all things considered. Furthermore, they had a choice whether to participate in the 401-K, knowing full well that to do so was putting more eggs in the same "basket" as their employment.

JMHO.

Charles Tutt (TM)



To: Mephisto who wrote (104)1/11/2002 3:10:07 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5185
 
Mephisto:

A lot of investors including CAPers and I think FLA Pers as well as individuals and I think Janus Fund owned a big chunk of Enron, this of course based on the prestigious Arthur Anderson accounting that confirmed it was a great company in which to invest.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News