SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155653)1/16/2002 8:49:10 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: I don't think that Hammer at launch will have the performance to justify a M3400+

So far, all model number ratings on Athlons have been quite conservative.

You might want to keep in mind, that AMD went from a 500mhz capability on .18 Aluminum (K6+) to 1.2GHZ (Athlon/Duron) when they lengthened the pipeline.

Motorola went from 400mhz to 800mhz from one month to the next when they lengthened their pipeline by 2 stages and added SOI (which is what AMD is doing as it goes from Athlon to Hammer).

Hammer could come out at quite a bit higher a mhz level than you are expecting.



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155653)1/16/2002 10:28:13 AM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
wbmw, I think milo is right. SSE2 alone will improve their benchmark scores by 10-15%.

C



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (155653)1/16/2002 12:23:55 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
wbmw, >And their models may need yet another adjustment in 2003 when Intel launches yet another variation of the Pentium 4, and this one is supposed to have Hyperthreading enabled (how will AMD rate their model numbers compared to that?).


Where'd you see that a desktop P4 would have Hyperthreading enabled next year? I hadn't seen anything about enabling that feature, except for servers, for the near term.

Tony