To: Famularo who wrote (613 ) 1/16/2002 11:00:23 PM From: Valuepro Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 930 Frank, Vaughn, I'm not nearly as excited as the market appears to be for PUG and ACA. I have small amounts of these and have held on for years thinking they've fallen to levels too cheap to sell. In this regard, I am pleased with the recent price action for these stocks. That aside, the press releases on Potentilla and Artemisia are not as good as they appear, IMHO. While the micro counts are high, and form the basis by which many judge Canadian pipes (at this stage in the popular learning curve anyway), one has to note that all the attention is on what is virtually diamond dust. Who cares what the count is from .1 to .5 mm? Further, if one reads the reports closely, it can be seen that there are minimal counts of stones over .5 mm., and no reports of stones over 1 mm. By comparison, TWG has unusually high proportions of stones over 1 mm in their samples and this should make for a better indication of larger, commercial stone sizes than is suggested by what others are reporting in the Canadian diamond hunt (based on micros). Further, something few people understand is that Ashton, via their counterpart in Australia, has proprietary technology in lab analysis. They can plot the diamond yield curve from indicator minerals. They don't need mico or macro counts. With this procedure they were able to calculate the yield at Argyle within 2-3%. Given that they have this technology, they have to keep poking holes in the ground until the lab tells them they are on to something. At this point, I would think it will be obvious to investors because ACA will begin to spend a lot of time and effort with one particular pipe, or cluster of pipes (regardless of micro and/or macro counts). In the meantime, it doesn't look to me as if they have anything they deem all that exciting, despite what the market thinks it knows.