Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (137136)	1/16/2002 5:19:25 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

"Makes you look cueless" Like I was clueless when I said that ARBA was not worth anywhere near $120. Or when I said that AMZN could drop 90% in price and still be overvalued. Or when I said that telecom capital equipment spending would go bust. Or when I said, In September 2000 that we were headed into recession in large part due to oil prices. Or when I said there was no way that Yahoo would grow at 50% last year. Yeah -- I guess I am the clueless one.

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (137136)	1/16/2002 5:35:41 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<< I'm not in your business. >> And what business would that be, William? The business of bringing up old posts? That's not what I hear... >>I don't think it is time to be talking about bottoms here Are we going to have to dredge up some of your posts from October, 1998? That's OK, GST, you're just not a good bottom man. ...er, analyzer. :) As a side note, on that particular day in the later part of 2000, the Naz closed at 3355, another in a long series of bottoms called by the master.