SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (16748)1/18/2002 12:44:46 PM
From: SirRealist  Respond to of 281500
 
I loved War of the Roses. I also had a terrifically bad divorce experience that caused irreparable damage to all the lives touched by it. I have no faith in the 'experts' about divorce, as a result.

And as a comparative, in the marriage or property settlement between Israel & Palestine, I see one spectacular dysfunctional party, a second that lapses into dysfunctionality at times, and most of the experts deciding how it should be handled have repeatedly been proven wrong.

I still believe it will take innovators to keep the children safe.



To: Ilaine who wrote (16748)1/18/2002 1:28:29 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I'd treat the 95% as a done deal, and ram it down both their throats. And I suspect that this is exactly what we are going to do.

Would you adhere to this decision even if the wife responded to the divorce case by buying a gun and attempting to kill the husband?



To: Ilaine who wrote (16748)1/18/2002 3:25:28 PM
From: BigBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
CB, have you ever been involved with divorce cases when both parties were demonstrably and repeatedly violent? If so, how does a judge typically rule?