Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (2383)	1/18/2002 12:57:54 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Well, Chris, I'd like to think that since you are an attorney with integrity who would never file a subpoena to harass anyone, that it would be fruitless and legally costly for anyone to not honor one of yours. In this particular case, it might even be advantageous for SI to get dragged into court over it. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure so to speak. In any event, the TMRT court ruling should be sufficient legal justification for their actions not to honor it (at least temporarily until they receive further compelling information about each person, as AOL requires) if SI doesn't want to say it was strictly an internal call. - Jeff