SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Corner Bay Silver (BAY.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (3069)1/19/2002 1:36:37 PM
From: Zardoz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4409
 
WE know it doesn't matter what the price of silver is relative to the price of BAY, for one simple reason. BAY aint in production. Making statements like silver at $4.50, bay should be $X.yz: are really a person touting the stock. Baseline valuations are useless. The recent trading pattern in BAY is not a baseline bottoming, but likely is a inflection point between the battle for longs and shorts. {often created by funds who'll aid support to the stock by buying more} in an attempt to hold value before months end. The real pressure from seller is likely on Tuesday as the secondary of loaned shares comes avaliable via Sprott. But then you do remember my PM ref: Sprott. It sure makes playing Pennies easy.



To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (3069)1/19/2002 2:47:39 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4409
 
<At $4.50 silver, BAY should be $5 at least. At $5.50 you have a $10 stock..and so on. >

Hello G_T,

I must admit that this a little pumpous. I should have said:

"Once in production, at $4.50 silver, BAY should be $5 at least. At $5.50 you have a $10 stock..and so on. "