Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Gary Dobry Subpoenas 41 SI Aliases -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (154)	1/19/2002 9:18:13 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1136

31. By: mobaction $$$ Reply to: 122477 by bob_z1 $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 6:52 PM EDT Post # 122478 of 122658 816-658-3463 ragingbull.lycos.com 32. By: laughing_rat_in_heat Reply to: 122478 by mobaction $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 6:56 PM EDT Post # 122480 of 122658 you can't say the officers name that took the report, and the case/report number? you are truly a baffoon!!! hahaha! knew you couldn't!! knew you wouldn't!!! ragingbull.lycos.com 33. By: bob_z1 $$$ Reply to: 122478 by mobaction $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 6:56 PM EDT Post # 122481 of 122658 LOL!!! Geez, you guys are both such liars! Didn't you even try calling that number before claiming it was the number for the police department in my town? Anyone else want to call it to verify they get the same recording I get? 816-658-3463 ragingbull.lycos.com 34. By: mobaction $$$ Reply to: 122478 by mobaction $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 6:58 PM EDT Post # 122483 of 122658 Sorry! The number is 816-658-3462 ragingbull.lycos.com 35. By: mobaction $$$ Reply to: 122481 by bob_z1 $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 6:59 PM EDT Post # 122485 of 122658 Read my post. I gave you the wrong number. Try the one I just gave you. 816-658-3462. ragingbull.lycos.com 36. By: bob_z1 $$$ Reply to: 122483 by mobaction $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 7:00 PM EDT Post # 122486 of 122658 Same message on this one: "The number you have dialed is disconnected or is no longer in service." Slow down, guys, and do at least a little bit of DD before putting numbers out here to nonexistent police departments. Sorry! The number is 816-658-3462 ragingbull.lycos.com 37. By: bob_z1 $$$ Reply to: 122485 by mobaction $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 7:05 PM EDT Post # 122488 of 122658 BTW, a reverse lookup on that number goes to a residence. The lookup on Metacrawler is frequently outdated, so it's no surprise it doesn't reflect that the number has changed or is no longer in service. ragingbull.lycos.com 38. By: janice456 $$$$ Reply to: 122440 by dirty_bull $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 7:07 PM EDT Post # 122489 of 122658 And Jay: I'm not a chronic liar like Dobry. I realize it's hard for chronic liars to understand that most people tell the truth (I could cite an interesting anecdote produced by Elena Bonner in her autobiography, which I found astounding, but that's another story) most of the time. Very few people lie habitually. Pugs, however, is one of them. No libel here: I can prove it hundreds of times over. Tonight you have the example of the #57 call that became a #69 call or...whatever. He lied. To YOU, I assume, unless you're as big a liar as he is. Now consider this, Jay: Dobry actually claims he got a "trace" on a call by means that are--according to the available facts--impossible. What do you think NOW, Jay, or will you just wuggle away, and come back when he's once again dangled a shiny object between your eyes? Did you ever hear from Marvin's radio station? ragingbull.lycos.com 39. By: bob_z1 $$$ Reply to: 122491 by bob_z1 $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 7:14 PM EDT Post # 122493 of 122658 Hmmm... No fresh phone numbers, eh? Guess they're probably dialing numbers at random now to at least find one that isn't disconnected. Betcha they don't give the name of the on-duty officer either. The one that was supposedly on-duty when the call was made. Another thing that seems to be eluding them is the fact that out in these parts, everyone knows or is (likely) related to everyone else. If they'd made such a call, I would've found out by now. I didn't call him, they didn't call the police department out here, and really look stupid for having said so. I agree with you, Janice. Either Gary blatantly lied to "mobaction" (I still don't accept 100% that it's Jay Marvin) or mobaction is himself just as much a liar. ragingbull.lycos.com 40. By: laughing_rat_in_heat Reply to: 122493 by bob_z1 $$$ Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001 at 7:21 PM EDT Post # 122494 of 122658 no, no, no bob!!! the way it works, the only way it can work is that a call is 'sent' to HIS phone company from *57... they cannot ID a phone number as they said!! the phone company much later may send that number to HIS local police, but much later, and the reporter of it wouldn't even know until after being contacted back by the police IN HIS AREA!! all the other bs from them, is nothing but total bs! they won't respond to any of my items in my summary they are truly laughable!!! ragingbull.lycos.com garydobryonlinelies.com