SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (221438)1/23/2002 2:14:10 PM
From: DOUG H  Respond to of 769670
 
The deficits after the next ten years will be huge.

That sounds great to me. The alternative is we stop spending money on all the worthless crapola and vote purchasing the Dems are doing. I know you'd be opposed to that because were it not for taking from some a giving to others, then skimming a little for themselves, no one would vote for Dems.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (221438)1/23/2002 2:52:52 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Well, the forecast is still for surpluses, but a lot can happen in ten years.

RE:The deficits after the next ten years will be huge.

Is your real name Nostradamus?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (221438)1/23/2002 5:53:57 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Kenneth, Crystal balls are not considered a reliable source of information.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (221438)1/24/2002 7:53:52 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
What a retarded statement. First of all, I am quite certain that the war will keep the budget in deficit not the tax cuts. But more importantly, once the war is winding downthere need be no deficits if spending is controlled. Your retarded post is typical of the demolib pinhead naysaying approach to all matters......

JLA