SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dave rose who wrote (646)1/24/2002 12:47:15 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 3602
 
Calling Inquiries a Distraction, Enron Chief Quits Under Pressure

By JIM YARDLEY and JOHN SCHWARTZ
The New York Times
Thursday January 24 09:22 AM EST

HOUSTON — Kenneth L. Lay resigned on Wednesday evening as chairman and chief executive of the Enron Corporation (NYSE:ENE - news) under pressure from outside creditors.

Mr. Lay, 59, suggested in a statement that he had decided to resign "in cooperation" with the court-appointed creditors committee that is overseeing the bankruptcy proceedings. He said the various federal inquiries into Enron's collapse were too large a distraction as he tried to resuscitate the company he has led since 1986.

"I want to see Enron survive, and for that to happen we need someone at the helm who can focus 100 percent of his efforts on reorganizing the company and preserving value for our creditors and hard-working employees," he said in a statement released by the company.

"Unfortunately," he added, "with the multiple inquiries and investigations that currently require much of my time, it is becoming increasingly difficult to concentrate fully on what is most important to Enron's stakeholders."

Mr. Lay will remain on Enron's board. The creditors committee is searching for a specialist in reorganizing companies to join Enron and serve as acting chief executive as soon as possible.

Thomas A. Roberts, a lawyer for Enron in New York, said that Mr. Lay had been discussing the possibility of resigning since early December. Mr. Roberts said that a representative of the creditors committee had called him Tuesday night. "The creditors committee really thinks Ken should think about stepping down as an officer and employee of the company," he said.

Mr. Roberts then called Mr. Lay at his home about 10 p.m. Tuesday. "I passed that along and said, `We probably need to think about this.' We talked about it awhile, and he said he was going to get something to eat and talked with his wife," Mr. Roberts said.

The two men talked again the next morning; Mr. Lay said that he would convene a conference call among the directors later that morning. Mr. Roberts was included in that call.

During the call, Mr. Lay gave a synopsis. "He said the time had come for him to resign as an officer of the company so that somebody could get in there and work on rebuilding it because his time was going to have to be dedicated to all of these investigations that were taking place," Mr. Roberts said.

Mr. Roberts said that it was very important that Mr. Lay was staying on as a board member because "he will continue to be available to advise the company."

The resignation of Mr. Lay comes after a string of recent revelations that have raised questions about the conduct of Enron's top executives, including Mr. Lay himself. Disclosures by Congressional investigators have shown that Mr. Lay helped create and oversee some of the financial arrangements that helped lead to Enron's collapse.

In August, he was warned in a private memorandum from a company vice president that Enron's accounting practices could bring down the company.

Yet even as he was selling his own shares of Enron stock in September and October, he was reassuring employees that the company would rebound and encouraging them to buy. His lawyer has said Mr. Lay was selling not because of lack of confidence in Enron but because he faced margin calls as investments in his personal portfolio declined in value.

Mr. Lay will now face scrutiny for his role in Enron's collapse from federal investigators and Congressional committees. On the day he resigned, the company that he had once helped develop into the nation's largest energy trader was instead a half-empty tower in which two floors were secured by federal agents.

A White House spokeswoman, Jeanie Mamo, said, "This doesn't change the president's focus, which is on the ongoing criminal investigation and on the policy reviews to protect people's pensions."

Mr. Lay had been a popular leader as Enron grew the last 15 years into an energy giant that he transformed, Cinderella style, from an unglamorous gas pipeline company. He was considered by peers as a man of big ideas, a crusader for free markets and a risk taker in the Texas wildcatter tradition. But while he was busy befriending the nation's most powerful politicians, erecting one of the tallest buildings in Houston and pledging $100 million to put Enron's logo on the city's new ballpark, the little things were turning out to be Mr. Lay's big problems.

One after another, disclosures spilled out of his company in recent months: off-balance-sheet partnerships had hidden billions in debt; years of Enron's reported profits had been exaggerated. The stock price, once at more than $90 a share, tumbled to less than a dollar. A flood of lawsuits resulted as retirement systems, shareholders, former employees and others said that Enron's failure to disclose its accounting flaws amounted to a violation.

"He fell on his sword," said John Olson, an energy industry analyst here who was a lone skeptic about Enron when the company was flying high. "It was probably the right thing to do. Given the climate of opinion in Houston, and where the company is in attempted recovery, this is probably in the best interests of everybody."

Mr. Lay hoped at first that he could avoid filing for bankruptcy when he entered into merger talks with Dynegy, his Houston rival. But that deal fell apart, spawning more lawsuits and hard feelings, and leaving Enron with little choice but to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. On Dec. 3, the company laid off more than 4,000 workers and was vilified in the hometown where he was once thought to be a mayoral candidate.

There is no question that Enron employees did benefit over the years when the stock price soared, as did Mr. Lay. He has collected more than $300 million since 1989, mostly through exercising stock options.

In Texas, he was first known as a friend and supporter of former President George Bush. But when George W. Bush ran for president in 2000, Mr. Lay gained a national reputation as one of the "pioneers," the top fund-raisers who gave more than $100,000 to Mr. Bush's presidential campaign. In all, Enron along with Mr. Lay have given more than $600,000 to Mr. Bush's political campaigns dating back to his first failed run for Congress in West Texas.

Enron did not limit its contributions to Mr. Bush. The company has made donations to nearly two-thirds of the members of Congress and much of the Republican establishment in Texas.



To: dave rose who wrote (646)1/24/2002 1:32:51 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (6) | Respond to of 3602
 
I didn't know that about Krugman, but there certainly is a lot of fingerpointing going on with all invovled with Enron.



To: dave rose who wrote (646)1/24/2002 4:00:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 3602
 
Andersen Under Fire at Enron Hearings

Thursday January 24, 3:09 pm Eastern Time

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Auditing firm Andersen came under heavy fire on Thursday, as a sacked Andersen partner refused to testify in Congress on the shredding of documents related to the Enron collapse, and senior Andersen officials tried to lay blame on their former partner.

And, as a new round of congressional hearings got underway into the energy giant's collapse and Anderson's involvement as its auditor, a senior lawmaker said Andersen officials were aware early on of Enron's problems.

Top Andersen executives said the destruction of documents being sought by investigators was wrong and largely the fault of David Duncan, a partner who managed the Enron account before he was fired.

Invoking his constitutional right not to incriminate himself, a stony-faced Duncan was quickly dismissed from one of two Capitol Hill hearings, prompting lawmakers to say he was frustrating their probe.

``Enron robbed the bank, Arthur Andersen provided the getaway car and they say you were at the wheel,'' said Rep. Jim Greenwood, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight and investigations.

Andersen fired Duncan earlier this month for what it said was his role in destroying documents related to the Enron audit. Duncan has said, through his lawyer, that he was following instructions from Andersen.

The hearings are the first of nine scheduled over the next six weeks into Enron's spectacular decline, going in a matter of weeks from energy trading colossus to the biggest U.S. bankruptcy filing in history.

Enron Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Ken Lay resigned late on Wednesday, saying he reached his decision in cooperation with the company's board and creditors committee.

Earlier on Thursday, Rep. Billy Tauzin, the Republican chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said evidence would emerge from the subcommittee hearing that would show the level of involvement of top Andersen officials.

``Senior officials and partners in Arthur Andersen were quite aware of the problems of Enron early off and began this process of invoking the so-called retention and destruction policy to clean out files and to alter and delete files from the records,'' Tauzin told ABC's ``Good Morning America'' show.

Tauzin said there were at least 80 people under Duncan who were working overtime in an attempt to clean out the files. He also said lawmakers interviewed Duncan for 4-1/2 hours before the FBI and Justice Department announced its interest in the case late last year.

In the Senate, where another committee was holding a simultaneous hearing, Connecticut Democratic Sen. Joseph Lieberman said he would further investigate Enron's links to the Bush administration. He said Enron had been exposed as a ''house of cards built on outrageous greed and deceit.''

Separately, Army Secretary Thomas White, the highest-ranking former Enron employee in the Bush administration, said in a letter to California Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman that no-one had asked him to intervene on Enron's behalf.

And, also on Capitol Hill on Thursday, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said he did not think the collapse of Enron would undermine confidence in the broader economy. ``I actually don't have that concern,'' he said.

WAS DUNCAN A SCAPEGOAT?

While Andersen squarely laid the blame on the Houston-based Duncan in prepared testimony for the House subcommittee, Florida Republican Rep. Cliff Stearns said Duncan may have been following orders, from higher up in Andersen, coded as reminders of document retention policies.

``Is Mr. Duncan being made a scapegoat?'' Stearns wondered aloud in opening remarks.

After Greenwood asked Duncan if he ordered destruction of documents to subvert government investigations into Enron's collapse, and if he did so at the direction of others, Duncan invoked his constitutional right not to incriminate himself.

``I would like to answer the committee's questions, but on the advice of my counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question based on the protection afforded me under the Constitution of the United States,'' said Duncan.

``Respectfully, that will be my response to all your questions,'' he told the committee. He was then excused from the witness table.

Andersen partner C.E. Andrews and Andersen managing director Dorsey Baskin, in written testimony to the subcommittee, said Duncan directed the purposeful destruction of a very substantial volume of documents.

``In doing so, he gave every appearance of destroying these materials in anticipation of a government request for documents,'' the two said.

``The case of Mr. Duncan was clear enough to allow us to draw conclusions about his responsibility at an early stage of the inquiry. That is not true of other Andersen personnel who were involved with the destruction of documents,'' the two Andersen executives told the House subcommittee.