SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gao seng who wrote (222120)1/25/2002 12:49:27 PM
From: ThirdEye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Corruption is a strong term to use in this case, and trying to pin it on Clinton is the ridiculous part. Did Leavitt take money from someone to change policy? Not so far as we knopw. Did anyone at the SEC? Don't know yet.

The evidence in this case begs the question: What other companies or industries, through the deliberate efforts of lobbyists, get exemptions from laws that were originally passed with the intent to protect us from abuse? Calling one situation corrupt would imply that it's all corrupt. But this is how business gets done in DC. And in this case it looks like a big mistake. But don't tell me it's a democrat thingy or just a republican thingy. After all, Bush's new SEC chairman is a former lobbyist for the big accounting firms. How hard do you think he's gonna crack down?



To: gao seng who wrote (222120)1/25/2002 5:40:41 PM
From: JEB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
This is the key to where everything went wrong with Enron.

There should be new legislation that imposes a stiff sentence and fine to anyone in a governmental position of power (including the President of the United States) who seeks an exemption from this law for another party.

It's now obvious the law worked well and was a prudent law because of the results that happened to Enron from this exemption.