Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (68903)	1/25/2002 2:30:26 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Albert, Where've you been hiding? I was beginning to think you fell of the face of the earth. Good to see you back on the thread! Re: <Intel is admitting that ia64 may fail> Most likely not. They just came to the conclusion that '8(years) is not enough, and neither is 9, here comes 10... whoops there it goes... and besides that the P4 is hopeless ...' IMO tgptndr

To: AK2004 who wrote (68903)	1/25/2002 6:59:57 PM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

albert: "it seems that new chip x86-64 variety. Intel would use it if itanium fails and hammer gains popularity. I think it is for real. Intel finally saw the light. :-)) Intel is admitting that ia64 may fail Plus Intel needed to reassure investors that company is not betting the farm on ia64." INTC has been doing an awful lot of reassuring over the past 3 years...If AMD has INTC snookered on the ia64 (all early indicators suggest that is so), no amount of reassuring is likely to stem the rate of accelerating decline evidenced by any objective review of INTC's financials over the past 3 years...