To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (10095 ) 1/26/2002 12:56:57 PM From: Kirk © Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10921 EXCELLENT point Brian!This consumer-doesn't-have-a-clue "logic", for lack of a better word, is utter nonsense. These same claims you make here were made when the x386 was on the market. Guess what? Increase the performance of the machine and applications will come along to take advantage of them. Lets say cell phone airtime on a cost per bit falls at the same rate as we saw memory prices fall between 1982 and 2002. I remember having to wait a few months for an HP 10 Meg Hard Disk to be released so my boss would buy me an HP150 PC (yea, a joke) that I could take home to use as a reward of sorts... I think it was about half the cost of the PC. Today, nearly 20 years later, I can buy 100Gig for $179 at Frys. factor of 10,000 in performance for more more than a factor of 10 less.. .so lets say it is 100,000 cost performance ratio. Now apply that cost to Cell Phone bits per minute. My guess is a 100,000 factor in price/performance will give you streaming video for under $100 a month. If anyone doesn't think there will be a TON made selling and fabing chips for this, then they are nuts. So, my prediction is we had the cost/performance of memory drop by a factor of 100,000 in the last 20 years and now the improvement will be in cost/per bit delivery via wireless (we might get fiber to the home, but nobody wants to be tied down... the "last few feet" will probably be wireless and I suspect "the last mile" might eventually be won in the wireless market as the cost of laying cable is very high... so cable will connect the local towers in neighborhoods... but wireless will connect the neighborhoods. Just my thinking... :) Kirk out