SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wildstar who wrote (14003)1/26/2002 2:11:59 PM
From: Don Lloyd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Wildstar -

The subjective marginal utility of taking additional newspaper is almost zero, unlike taking an additional can of coke.

Once a newspaper has been read once, nothing is gained from reading another copy of the newspaper.

However, if cokes sat in an open rectangular tray, people would take additional cokes and hoard them for use later.


Exactly.

More generally, all values are subjective. Almost all economic goods are subject to the law of diminishing marginal utility. The rate at which the subjective marginal utility diminishes with quantity is far greater for newspapers than it is for soft drinks.

Using market capitalization to value an entire company, or an index of companies on the basis of the last market trade price independent of volume is fundamentally suspect. If it weren't for an expectation of wanting to resell stock into the market at inflated prices in the future, company buyouts would only involve paying full price for an effective controlling interest, not for all shares.

Regards, Don



To: Wildstar who wrote (14003)1/26/2002 7:24:41 PM
From: Moominoid  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
I have only seen these newspaper dispensers in the United States. Something else to be explained. You'd expect the homeless etc. to steal them and go sell them down the street?