Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (6794)	1/27/2002 2:17:34 PM
From: Valuepro	Respond to of 7235

marcos, "...not sure i'd like to see an attempt at this shareprice." I believe SUF adopted a rights plan some years ago, so the questions is, what price would make the stakeholders happy?

To: marcos who wrote (6794)	1/27/2002 2:37:33 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

That would be crudestope: Message 12333063 He last posted in June 2000, promising to be back in a week ... ? Message 13897741

To: marcos who wrote (6794)	1/28/2002 9:03:58 AM
From: Letmebe Frank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Marcos & gang.... Re: Speaking of stockhouse - Frank and Georges, how are you getting in there? ... it won't work for me, i get a pop-up that says 'document contains no data, try again later or contact admin' .... rarely have i ever lurked the suf thread over there, tend to forget it exists siliconinvestor.com Marcos - I recently got the same message on my posts, as of 2 weeks. I hear from Fast Frank Farmulo that when I try to post, others see my name, but posts on Stockhouse show up as "removed by BB admin". I may try to rejoin. No rush though. Not many folk over there worth the time to type...lotso childish banter, at least on the TWG & SUF threads. Re CRUDESTOPE: I would like to make readers of this SouthernEra website aware of a smear campaign being conducted by a Canadian broker assisted by two associates one of whom was a Nesbitt Burns dealer who was dismissed for shady practices. The broker has also interfered in the company's joint venture negotiations and falsely claimed to represent the majority of shareholders. We suspect that the broker regularly posts messages on this site. Message 11832371 Of the 4 replys to the above message, Only Buylowsellhigh seemed bent out of shape by Crudestopes claim: Oh Yeah! Suddenly, you come out of nowhere and drop this bullshit of a smear campaign! Oh Great! What's Next? Overstatement of the Klipspringer results? Nesbitt Burns broker? Okay, give us a name? Why is Canaccord conducting a Bear Raid on SUF and not Nesbitt? Hey! I've got my cotton candy and buttered popcorn along with the 3D glasses just waiting for the details. Sure would like to know who Crudestope was referring to....