Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (69203)	1/27/2002 9:35:17 PM
From: fyodor_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

hmaly: How on earth does Elmers statement only refer to the model XP2000, instead of all XP's. You need to include all of Elmer's original comment, not just the first half of it: Elmer: The XP which AMD can only make in "10s of thousands" is almost as fast as Intel's high volume NWs so that makes things great. There is no doubt that the above refers the XP2000+ and not all XPs. -fyo

To: hmaly who wrote (69203)	1/27/2002 10:08:17 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

How on earth does Elmers statement only refer to the model XP2000, instead of all XP's. hmaly, is all that concrete dust getting to your brain? Can't you comprehend simple English? Here's what I said: "The XP which AMD can only make in 10s of thousands is almost as fast as Intel's high volume NWs so that makes things great" Which one is almost as fast as NW? The XP2000+ which AMD could only make in the "10s of thousands" according to AMD's own statements. If you think they're liars you are joining a growing group. It's really this simple. I can't spend all my time explaining the simplest things to the simplest people. End of subject. EP