Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (157064)	1/27/2002 10:15:07 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 186894

Beamer, Barron's not-negative article on Intel. Hard to believe for that rag: ======================================================================================== Pessimism over Intel may be overdone -Barron's NEW YORK, Jan 27 (Reuters) - Recent pessimism over Intel Corp.'s(NasdaqNM:INTC - news) prospects may be overdone, with the semiconductor giant poised to show improving profit margins and boost production with more efficient technology, according to an article in the weekly business magazine Barron's. Although the full impact of those factors may not be felt until 2003, they should help leave Intel's shares plenty of room to retrace recent losses, the weekly magazine said. The No. 1 computer chip maker's shares slumped more than 8 percent within a week after Jan. 15, when it issued a gloomy sales forecast for the first quarter of 2002. They have since retraced their losses somewhat, closing Friday at $33.68. The Santa Clara, California-based company's switch from 200 millimeter wafer production to far more efficient 300 millimeter wafers -- a process that could last another two years or more -- will double production, Barron's said. In addition, Intel's order book is strong -- though the company has conceded that orders could be canceled if demand for PCs drifts back down after the surprising fourth-quarter lift. Orders are likely to grow as the economy rebounds, and companies look to replace the personal computers they purchased ahead of Y2K, Barron's said. biz.yahoo.com

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (157064)	1/27/2002 11:45:35 PM
From: milo_morai	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Wanna know your are sounding foolish. Wanna writes: Neither latency nor bandwidth by themselves is relevant when talking about getting data to the CPU Wanna latency is very relative to CPU performance. Disable your L2 cache in BIOS and run some benchmarks. You change the Latency to the CPU by doing so. Bandwidth only comes into play if your pushing a large amount of data. I've been talking about performance this whole time. You sould like your talking about trace runs on the MB which by the way have a latency attached to them. That's why the L2 was integrated on to the chip. I guess I over estimated you. Milo