SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Biddle who wrote (18599)1/29/2002 7:40:42 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196654
 
Re : Verizon rep. demonstrating 1X technology -- it is a bit hard to believe that Qualcomm was "slammed" on at least two different occasions when someone (New York Times (?)) started "talking up" the idea that what Verizon "really might do" was :

Discard their CDMA infrastructure.

Put in GSM.

Then, put in GPRS.

Then, put in EDGE.

Then, put in WCDMA.

Did any "uppity" person ask the rep. why Verizon decided not to pursue that "great" Euro-centric evolution path ?

Jon.



To: John Biddle who wrote (18599)1/30/2002 1:11:41 AM
From: Asterisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196654
 
did the rep address the inherant security concerns that have been raised about 802.11?



To: John Biddle who wrote (18599)1/30/2002 7:41:03 AM
From: Keith Feral  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196654
 
I admire VZ for taking a shot at the AOL title. Why not charge $30 a month for ISP services at 144 kbps. It is a modest premium to $20 dial up speeds and a modest discount to DSL speeds.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News