Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Shread who wrote (28895)	1/30/2002 4:02:16 PM
From: Joseph Silent	Respond to of 52237

I tried to place some naked calls this afternoon .... when I was at my broker just before the FOMC meeting, but they managed to get the phone away from me and then they threw me out. Just my luck. I really don't understand this investing business. :)

To: Paul Shread who wrote (28895)	1/30/2002 4:04:30 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

Gersh - Ahhh, Paul, yes, it should meet minimum requirement and this is in the range of a fib bounce of yesterday's drop. Just what we need, more conflicting signals!!! Nice hammers with volume to make the charts pretty, some short term VIX fear to shake out new weak hands yet real fundamental ugliness and lack of confidence that gives a reason for teh drop to be real and the rally false. Note how the NASDAQ barely budged and never got any real fear. QCOM still above where it's bad report was made. Most of Larry's "Q" EMLX, BRCD etc higher than 22 Jan. MMM loses an asbestos case and rallies up over a point? This high TICK reading is bugging me though so I am just going to hold my box and let things shake out a few days. Good Luck, Lee