Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (950)	1/30/2002 5:44:40 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3602

Didn't Clinton also take illegal campaign contributions from the Chinese and then give them favorable treatment on some export matters in his first term? Didn't he also personally make a phone call to the CEO of a major Hollywood studio about a million-dollar litigation dispute that one of his Hollywood friends/donors had with the studio? Didn't he.... Oh, don't get me started. This is the Enron thread. But the point is, there's a huge difference between being bought and paid for and being given money and then still acting with integrity. Which so far it appears the Bush folks did with respect to Enron's troubles. As for the energy policy, I would expect Enron and the oil companies and lots of others to weigh in with their opinions. That is likely all that the documents show.