SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (223761)1/30/2002 10:57:36 PM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Ann,

My understanding is that Starr could only investigate those areas that the AG allows him to. Starr was given phone tapes from Linda Tripp, he then sent the information to the AG, who told him the go ahead and look into it.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (223761)1/31/2002 5:53:18 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
First, the Whitewater investigation yielded about 18 convictions, which is not too shabby. Second, it is not the purpose of the independent prosecutor to nail someone. If a case cannot be made, they are supposed to make that clear, too. Third, if there were uncooperative witnesses (for example, Susan MacDougal) and possible cover- up, there is only so much the IP can do. Fourth, whatever problem there may have been in the allocation of resources in such investigations was a function of the law creating the Office of the Independent Prosecutor, which was not under normal prosecutorial constraints. It was not a very good law. But as long as it existed, it had to be applied even- handedly, to Democrats as well as Republicans, and it was........