To: Greg or e who wrote (43145 ) 2/3/2002 8:00:38 PM From: E Read Replies (1) | Respond to Greg, Christopher isn't using "reverse psychology"! He is putting on a special kind of show in order to fool you and others, it seems clear to me, and it seems to me he has succeeded, with some. He wants retroactively to redefine what he did in the Poet case as Teasin'. Just Good Clean Fun! Reverse psychology! What a cutup he is! Just one prank after another! Funfunfun!No one defended him, once it became completely clear he could not offer a single bit of evidence, and that his claim in fact was the opposite of her views, which were there for all to read. had actual transcripts of hot cybersex with some woman, would threaten her with public exposure? Would come onto a chat thread and tell everyone ? A cad, that's what kind. This is a case in which even if his claims had been true, maybe especially if they had been true, truth was no defense.) all defended the calumny he made about Poet's bad-mouthing "our young men in uniform." Because she didn't do it. She didn't do it, Greg. He made it up. He succeeded in upsetting her greatly by it, as was surely his desire, and I felt so bad for her that I spent a good deal of time here to be sure it was clear to all that he could not show a single post of hers oppose to either our "young men in uniform," or to our military response to September 11.obscure the line between the YYB events, which are annoying to YYB but not remotely as horrifying and upsetting as were his untruths and insinuations and his creepy behavior that made him look like an obsessed stalker, to Poet.
