Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (43256)	2/4/2002 1:39:07 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

That makes me laugh. I have been talked about ad nauseum on the RWer thread. What is your position on that? And have you talked about anyone on threads on which they can't reply? I note, btw, that Poet does not identify you by name or handle in this post on IHub: Posted by: Poet In reply to: None Date: 2/4/2002 11:54:55 AM Post # of 601 I have had a great deal of trouble with a person over the past few months and left SI because of him. I moved to IHub because I had reassurance that on my own threads I'd be able to remove the posts he makes to me. Not only is he continuing to post to me here, but he's now made a statement on SI that my sign-off (the smooch) "Apparently doesn't bother her that some people might see that a bit forward and an unwanted cyber sexual advance." I had no intention to appear anything but friendly with that sign-off. It has been removed. Cyberstalkers should be prosecuted. I don't talk about anyone on threads on which they can't reply. If I've ever done it, it has been inadvertent. You know you've driven Poet off of SI. Why did you post that provocative post implying ludicrously that a "Smooch," not even directed at an individual, on her own thread's heading, might be felt by someone to be as "unwanted sexual advance." What is wrong with your perceptions? Who, for example, might consider the generic smooch on the heading and some cute graphic "an unwanted sexual advance" to them? Who? It's just a way of harassing her, is all. She took it off, explained why, and goodie goodie you get to be involved with her again.