SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4992)2/5/2002 2:22:22 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
Frank,

You gotta learn how to read <smile>:

What they said:

Most users will have two-way connections that provide up to 64 Mbps on the downlink and up to 2 Mbps on the uplink.

What they didn't say, but would have with more ethical backbone:

This is a shared system, each cell is about 160 square miles, all users in this area share the maximum of 2Mbps. We'll sell the hell out of this system and everyone will get stomped. This set-up, if we can secure a customer base, will be more bitrate constrained than a 56K DUN modem. This system will be non-competitive, on a bitrate per buck or user satisfaction basis with any broadband offering. But we don't give a shit, because we're only trying to sell stock to a remarkable simple witted general public in an IPO exit event.

-R.



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4992)2/5/2002 11:57:17 PM
From: Peter Ecclesine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 46821
 
Hi Frank,

As IP doesn't know space, the handoffs present an NP-complete computational problem.

AstroData had 300mi diameter spot beams which could spacially overlap but not in frequency, and I suppose the same is true for TD. So a frequency plan for New York City or Hong Kong would reveal much.

Uplink data rates are limited by CPE antenna size/gain, just (moving) like VSATs.

petere