Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rob S. who wrote (9120)	2/5/2002 10:35:41 PM
From: mad dog from over there	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11568

who would believe a response? I wouldnt GX and ENron lied about their financials 1 month prior to chapter 11. Asking a company to change accepted accounting rules on their balance sheet mid year might be impossible, I dont know. We will see what thursday brings us. What makes me very curious and angry with the mob is wheres the mention of ATT? They have been in trouble for 3 years now. They are the main reason for the demise of lucent. Also they put all of their eggs in the cable basket, and failed, yet no scrutiny of ATT. ATT is never afraid to write new business for less than what it costs them to provide it. I see it over and over again. It will eventually catch up with them.

To: Rob S. who wrote (9120)	2/5/2002 10:42:54 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11568

Sorry for the harsh response to your other post. As for writing off the goodwill, I agree that it would simplify things. That's something else you can blame on the accounting profession - unnecessarily complicated balance sheets. I worry, however, that all these pundits would respond by saying "See, I told you it was worthless." Well, WCOM never claimed it was worth a dime - they had no choice but to put it on the books. Have I ever posted here my explanation of how, under GAAP, when you buy another company your calculator automatically stops using conventional math and switches to GAAP mode where 1+1 sometimes equals 10? Well, that's purchase accounting. All investors would be much better off, and would have more hair left, if they just lopped off all goodwill, an equal amount of book equity (which is generally irrelevant anyway) and added back the associated amortization to past reports of income. The funny part is that the silly accountants thought they could fix things by changing the rules on amortization - you no longer have to amortize it, but just write it down every now and then whenever someone at the audit firm decides it's "impaired." They only confused people more. But then, that's the way they think - make it complicated so that they can justify billing you for more hours. They do it with tax laws. Lawyers do it too. Why not auditors? Bob