SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (47512)2/6/2002 6:10:03 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Crisis of Confidence

SmartMoney.com
Wed Feb 6, 3:56 PM ET

HOW MANY rotten apples does it take to spoil the whole bag? That's the question investors are asking themselves these days as corporate America divulges one accounting scandal after another. None has been nearly as devastating — or as nefarious — as the Enron (Other:ENRNQ) debacle, of course, but fear continues to ripple through the marketplace nonetheless.

If, in the days ahead, new revelations show that more corporations have systematically concealed (criminally or otherwise) the true state of corporate revenues and profits, confidence could be shattered — spelling even more trouble. As the perception of risk rises, markets would insist on more compensation for shouldering that added risk. Investors would be willing to pay less for each dollar of corporate earnings, which would mean broadly lower stock prices. And lenders would demand more return for parking their money in corporate bonds, which would mean higher interest rates. This tightening of the financial markets could constrict the flow of capital, shrink household wealth and raise borrowing costs. All that in turn could slow spending by both consumers and businesses, nipping the burgeoning economic recovery in the bud.

OK, that's the worst-case scenario. Still, the potential for an Enron-inspired domino effect is very much on the mind of behavioral economists, who study the relationship between psychology and finance. ``We have an accounting crisis at the same time that we have record [price-to-earnings] multiples, and we're in a recession,'' says Robert Shiller, the author of ``Irrational Exuberance'' and a professor of economics at Yale University. ``The market is vulnerable.''

The general investing malaise brought on by daily revelations of dubious corporate accounting practices — what Wall Street has dubbed ``Enronitis'' — has already helped spark a broad downturn in equities in the New Year. Since stocks peaked a month ago, the Standard & Poor's 500 is down 7.6%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is off 5.9%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite is 12% lighter.

To some economists, the pullback reflects a healthy reassessment of marketplace risk. Companies that used overly aggressive accounting practices to inflate results will be taken to task, whereas the vast majority of companies that accurately report earnings will survive the shakeout relatively unscathed. ``It's hard to believe that this is endemic,'' says Jeremy Siegal, a finance professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business. ``A number of companies, particularly in the tech sector, have stretched the concept of earnings in their favor.... But the vast majority of companies are clean.''

To others, however, the retreat in equities represents an increasingly pervasive mistrust in the entire corporate-reporting system. Or, as Woody Dorsey, a behavioral market expert and the founder of research firm Market Semiotics, explains: ``Enron has galvanized the markets to question accounting and profitability in general.... Every balance sheet now becomes a question mark, rightly or wrongly.'' To some extent, this has already started happening.

Although Tyco International (NYSE:TYC - news) is perhaps the poster child of the new guilty-until-proven-innocent mentality (year-to-date, Tyco's stock is down more than 50% amid concerns over the conglomerate's muddy accounting practices and rising debt load), charges of suspect accounting have been leveled against a number of companies, including telecom provider Global Crossing (OTC:GBLXQ - news), struggling Irish pharmaceutical company Elan (NYSE:ELN - news), PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC - news) and Enterasys Networks (NYSE:ETS - news), a maker of networking hardware and software. In addition, many companies are simply suffering from guilt-by-Enron-association (think Calpine (NYSE:CPN - news) and Williams (NYSE:WMB - news)) or overly complex balance sheets (General Electric (NYSE:GE - news) comes to mind). Others, such as J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE:JPM - news) and Citigroup (NYSE:C - news), are on the hook for billions of dollars in debt that may never get paid. ``The financial markets are shot through with problems of asymmetric information,'' says Lawrence White, a professor of economics at New York University's Stern School of Business. ``What you're going to see is companies falling all over themselves to be greater revealers.''

It's the fear of exactly what these companies might reveal — or keep concealed — that now threatens market stability. ``Most of us have no way of knowing which company will be next,'' says John R. Nofsinger, the author of ``Investment Madness: How Psychology Affects Your Investing...and What to Do About It'' and a finance professor at Washington State University.

This extreme form of uncertainty, is what markets hate most of all. American capitalism's strength has always been its comprehensive set of rules and regulations meant to protect shareholders from greedy corporate managers, explains Terrance Odean, assistant professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley. Although U.S. investors are willing to take on the risk that a business won't live up to its performance expectations, they've always believed that insider trading and full disclosure laws would prevent outright fraud. While Odean thinks we're ``a long way from supposing that we can't trust companies not to defraud us,'' he concedes that the Enron scandal ``is not a step in the right direction.'' Barton Biggs, Morgan Stanley's chief U.S. strategist, is blunter: ``Investors know there will always be cheats and frauds, but they rely on the governance system of the Fed, the SEC, the exchanges and the accounting profession to protect them,'' he writes. ``If the people begin to believe the stock market is a manipulated game for insiders, the wealthy and the hedge funds, they won't entrust their savings and pensions to it. That's a big deal.''

For the most part, however, economists remain confident in the continued smooth functioning of the capital markets, whether or not the stock market continues to sink. Indeed, the pessimistic assumptions built into the bond market after Sept. 11 have been easing. To John Puchalla, chief economist at Moody's Investors Service, that suggests that ``things aren't falling apart.'' The spread, or difference in yields, between corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury securities is a sensitive indicator of how worried investors are about the state of the economy and the health of corporations, since it reflects the premium they demand for lending money to companies instead of parking it in risk-free government bonds. At 2.20%, the spread of investment-grade corporate bonds over Treasurys has remained virtually unchanged this year, and is down from a peak of 2.50% last fall, according to Standard & Poor's. Spreads on speculative bonds (bonds that pay a high yield to compensate for greater risk) over government debt have slightly widened over the past few weeks, to 10.12% from 9.80% in early January, but that's still down substantially from an October peak of 12.70%. ``There's a problem, but it's a matter of degree,'' says David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's. ``We don't think it's going to get much worse.''

And it could be argued that any further Enron-related decline in equities — so long as it's orderly and moderate — might actually be healthy for individual investors and the market system in the long term. For investors, the lesson should be one of diversification. ``To the extent that it alerts workers participating in 401(k) plans to the risk of holding high fractions of their money in company stocks...it's an eye opener,'' says David I. Laibson, assistant professor of economics at Harvard University. For the markets, the accounting debacle could have the perverse effect of restoring investors' confidence in the capital system, assuming government and corporate reforms lead to greater transparency and fairness. ``The U.S. has led the world in regulation of capital markets,'' says Yale's Shiller. ``I want to see us move and contain this crisis.... I think that's what will happen.''



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (47512)2/6/2002 10:35:49 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
jw: I think you'll like this Gilder parody:

Message 17022876



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (47512)2/7/2002 4:08:56 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
OSIS from Briefing:

Stock Profile : Short-sellers are discovering that momentum players as a whole aren't the clueless stock bandits that their choice of equities sometimes portrays. Today, shares of X-ray screening and explosive detection systems designer OSI Systems (OSIS 24.55 +2.97) have exploded to their highest level since March 2000, as traders recognize the presence of this important technical area and short-sellers give up the ghost and reach for a bottle of aspirin. More intriguing is the possibility of institutional accumulation of this name in the same fashion that contributed to InVision's (INVN) rise from $3 to $47 (1467%). Many shorts bet against INVN on the assumption that it was nothing more than a plaything of momentum players. It is evident by the short interest (24% of the float) that some of the same assumptions are being made about OSIS... OSI Systems is a designer of security products ranging from carry-on passenger baggage screening equipment to large cargo X-ray scanning systems. In 2000, the co was awarded a contract by the FAA valued at up to $40 mln to provide x-ray screening systems at selected airports throughout the U.S. Along with the FAA business, OSI garners revenue from freight carriers, private business, and government facilities, to name a few. Co recently struck a deal to acquire PerkinElmer's carry-on passenger baggage screening assets. If approved, the purchase would vault OSI to the top position in the market for carry-on systems and potentially double co's security business. In addition, OSI will acquire assets related to PE's ARGUS explosive detection X-ray system. ARGUS technology is being developed under FAA grants to three companies (L-3, PE, and InVision) as a less expensive alternative for explosives detection at mid-sized, regional airports. OSI is also the lone recipient of phase two contract from the FAA for the development of an even smaller detection system named BANTAM... After rising almost 500% since 9/11, stock still sports a market-cap of less than $300 mln. On forward P/E basis, stock trades at 31x projected 2002 earnings of $0.78. Estimates are likely to climb as orders related to the Airline Security fall into backlog. Given that OSI is positioned for explosive growth over the next several yrs, we do not think a 31x multiple is out of line. While stock is vulnerable to a near-term pullback, we do not believe this will be the last time in the coming months that investors will find the stock trading at a new high. --Damon Southward, Briefing.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (47512)2/7/2002 4:31:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Enron Traded Business for Investments With Merrill

(Update2)
By Russell Hubbard and Jeff Bliss

Washington, Feb. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp. promised to give bond
underwriting business to Merrill Lynch & Co. and First Union Corp., now
Wachovia Corp., in return for investments in some of the off-balance sheet
partnerships set up by former Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow that led to
Enron's bankruptcy.

Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Billy Tauzin, a Louisiana
Republican, said Enron offered the business to the banks in exchange for
investments because an outside investor was required by accounting rules to
keep the partnerships from being consolidated on Enron's balance sheets.

Tauzin's comments, at a hearing today, came as lawmakers are expanding their
line of inquiry to at least look at the role that Wall Street firms played in financing
Enron's rise. Enron employed more than a dozen banks and securities firms.
Over the past 17 years, the company and its predecessors sold 138 bonds and
over the past eight years were involved in 69 completed or attempted acquisitions
with an announced value of almost $40 billion.

``Enron, the seventh largest company in the nation, a darling of Wall Street, a
publicly held company, failed, taking with it the incomes, the savings, the hopes,
the aspirations, the dreams of its employees,'' said Representative John Dingell,
a Democrat from Michigan. ``This Congress has a duty to find out what
happened.''

Calls to Merrill and First Union weren't immediately returned.

Fifth Amendment

Fastow and three Enron Corp. executives who participated in secret partnerships
refused today to testify before Congress on the company's collapse, citing their
Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

In addition to Merrill and Wachovia, Enron's banks included Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter & Co., Citigroup Inc., Lehman Brothers Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase &
Co., Deutsche Bank AG, CIBC World Markets, a unit of Canadian Imperial Bank
of Commerce, and Credit Suisse First Boston.

Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, now a part of Credit Suisse First Boston, handled
at least one Enron partnership, Whitewing Management LLP. Jeanmarie
McFadden, a spokeswoman for Credit Suisse, declined to comment. Officials at
Lehman Brothers, J.P. Morgan Chase and Salomon Smith Barney, Citigroup's
securities unit, Deutsche Bank and CIBC also declined to comment.

$1 Billion in Losses Hidden

Judy Hitchen, a spokeswoman for Morgan Stanley, said she believed the firm
had no direct involvement with the Enron partnerships.

Enron, which had more than 3,000 subsidiaries and affiliated partnerships, hid
more than $1 billion in losses in the partnerships before it filed the largest
bankruptcy in U.S. history Dec. 2. Investors included managing directors at
Merrill, which helped sell one of the partnerships to institutional investors.

Merrill executives invested their own money in LJM2, one of Enron's limited
partnerships, after the firm helped raise $349 million for the partnership from
pension funds and other institutional investors.

In an internal e-mail, Merrill said that LJM2 was expected to return more than 30
percent a year. That's triple the average return on the Standard & Poor's 500
Index, the benchmark for U.S. stocks, over the past 75 years. Members of the
investment banking executive committee were encouraged to invest by Daniel
Bayly, then head of the group, said one investor familiar with the offer who spoke
on condition of anonymity.

Other Witnesses

In addition to Fastow, Michael Kopper, who ran a partnership, and Richard Buy,
who headed the company's risk assessment office, invoked their Fifth
Amendment right to not answer questions. Chief Accountant Richard Causey
also pleaded the Fifth, saying he recently hired new lawyers. Jeffrey Skilling, the
former chief executive officer, was scheduled to testify later today.

The executives join Kenneth Lay, who resigned as Enron's chairman this week,
and David Duncan, the Arthur Andersen LLP official who audited the
Houston-based company's finances, in declining to explain the biggest
bankruptcy in U.S. history. Enron collapsed in December with the loss of 5,500
jobs and $78 billion in market value since August 2000.

Skilling's Role

Skilling, who served as Enron's chief executive officer from February 2001 to
August 2001, quit four months before the Dec. 2 bankruptcy filing. He is the
highest ranking current or former officer to agree to appear, and he plans to
testify, Tauzin said.

Lay, a friend of George W. Bush, was the president's biggest campaign
contributor, while Enron was the biggest corporate contributor. Three of every four
dollars the company gave to politicians went to Republicans to whom executives
now are answering in congressional hearings, according to the Center for
Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign finance.

Enron, once the largest trader of natural gas and electricity, lost $78 billion in
market value since August 2000. The company formed at least 3,000 affiliated
partnerships where it hid debt and losses from shareholders, said William
Powers Jr., the University of Texas Law School dean who investigated the matter
for Enron's board.

Fastow paid himself $30 million for managing one of the partnerships, which
purported to shift investment risk from Enron to an independent outside firm,
Powers said.

Enron's collapse began when it reported third-quarter earnings in October. The
company surprised investors with $1 billion in losses from the partnerships.
Shares plunged and the company lost the credit rating it need to borrow money
needed to support the $2.8 billion in trades it did each day.