SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (157956)2/6/2002 9:38:17 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan
I recall reading in the news that alchemy run into problems raising next round of venture capital. Which means it was a fire sale and amd got fairly good deal on it. I would guess that Intel would try to avoid betting on alchemy since that would undermind their strongarm. So it is likely that in addition to amd there were only few bidders if any and that would suggest a deal again
Regards
-Albert



To: Dan3 who wrote (157956)2/6/2002 11:18:12 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
A$$hole Dan - "This is just speculation, but they most likely turned down more money from Intel for a chance to become part of AMD."

You are a complete sack of sh!t.



To: Dan3 who wrote (157956)2/7/2002 12:30:29 AM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, Re: "This is just speculation, but they most likely turned down more money from Intel for a chance to become part of AMD."

I know that in your own little world, Intel's a one-trick pony CPU dealer, but in real life, Intel has a product called StrongARM that already serves all the same functions as the Alchemy product lines. Intel would have no reason to be interested in a second embedded line.

wbmw