SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (71203)2/8/2002 6:21:12 PM
From: TenchusatsuRespond to of 275872
 
Joe, <I don't understand why you feel the need to defend indefensible.>

Maybe because my multiple experiences with it have been far more positive than the one experience you've had. It's a shame that your monitor was not fully utilized by the integrated graphics, because in every 810/815 system I've built, the monitor works well with the graphics.

I'm not saying that your bad experience should be ignored, though. Nor am I saying that the integrated solutions from Sis and VIA are worse. All I'm saying is that from my point-of-view, the 810/815 integrated graphics have done very well.

Tenchusatsu



To: Joe NYC who wrote (71203)2/8/2002 10:51:26 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: There is absolutely no excuse for it. Even the lowest end Sis, and Via chipset far surpass the graphics in 815

I'm a little embarrassed to say that my fastest home machine, an Athlon 1.4GHZ with 512meg of DDR266 and a 40gig 7200RPM drive is running a SiS 6326 video card that cost $39 a couple of years ago. But it does up to 1600x1200 and all I do is 2D graphics and text (at home).


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News