Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (158365)	2/11/2002 4:02:05 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "I just checked Intel's web page and found this link. It compares X-Scale to StrongARM, both in MIPS and Power." developer.intel.com; I just wanted to comment on the reduced power levels of X-Scale, since they are really good compared to StrongARM. At 400MHz, it looks like Intel is claiming 33% more performance than their 233MHz StrongARM and 1/5 the power. If that's even close to being true, then X-Scale definitely stands to be a winner - especially as it eventually scales to 800MHz, offering more than 2.5x the performance for the same amount of power. And all this at .18u! wbmw