Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (113059)	2/11/2002 5:58:35 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

>> You are saying it in jest, but I will say it in all seriousness. Sorry, I was playing with you, Dipy. I can tell you're sincere, but let me tell you, bro, you haven't discovered "truth"; you're just interpolating from your own experiences as I am from mine. In udder words, you got your opinion, I got mine. uf

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (113059)	2/11/2002 10:02:32 PM
From: David E. Taylor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Dipy: Look at what happened in 2001. The markets down some 10% and the Nasdaq in particular down 21%. Yet, there were spectacular rallies, esp for the Naz, of 41% and 44%. Somebody taking advantage of that would be up over 100%, if he had stepped aside during the declines. If he had gone short during the declines, he would have made even more. Even the most stupid and moronic of us can play the left hand side of the charts profitably. At least I would think so... David T.