SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (158616)2/13/2002 12:08:33 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
CJ, thanks, but is 5 GHz worse than, say 4 or 3 GHz? That's the implication I got. From my EMR experience, higher frequencies always penetrate better than lower ones. Is there anything different about 5 GHz?

Tony



To: combjelly who wrote (158616)2/13/2002 12:42:03 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
cj,

I have some friends who started a business that is installing the wireless networks in the buildings, and generally, the reality is very far from expectations. Some people expect that this technology will avoid wiring. The reality is that a lot of wiring is needed, to bring access points within certain distance, and with going through as few walls as possible.

Joe


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News