Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (226757)	2/13/2002 12:46:25 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

MSFT's "investment" in Washington politics really isn't paying off. Now the SEC is attacking them for trying to hide profits: Continuing SEC Probe of Microsoft Seeks Details on Understated Results By REBECCA BUCKMAN Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL While Enron Corp. gets raked over the coals for allegedly inflating profit, federal securities regulators continue to investigate a very different accounting question about Microsoft Corp.: Did the software company improperly hoard cash in some quarters during the 1990s, making profits appear smaller than they actually were in those periods? The continuing Securities and Exchange Commission examination of Microsoft's accounting was first disclosed by the company two and a half years ago, and many industry analysts say they aren't concerned about it, even with the recent publicity surrounding Enron. The issue at Microsoft "was one of really being too conservative" in accounting for certain revenue, said Rick Sherlund, who follows Microsoft for Goldman Sachs Group Inc. "It's the opposite we're concerned about -- companies that are too aggressive in revenue recognition." But the SEC is still concerned that Microsoft may have set up an accounting system that held back revenue in the form of certain cash reserves during some quarters, and then applied the reserves to future quarters to smooth out earnings, people familiar with the matter say. That practice could be construed as misleading to investors. Although the case is extremely nuanced and has been going on for years -- leading some to speculate that it could be difficult for the SEC to bring charges -- the investigation is active, a person close to the matter said. . . . online.wsj.com

To: Zoltan! who wrote (226757)	2/13/2002 1:42:54 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

LOL! A seven count unanimous conviction on monopoly violations by a US federal appeals court (good Republican nominees...) - marking the third court decision (out of three...) to rail against MS's free market subverting practices in the past decade, followed by a new 'Justice Dept.' about-face and a deal with more loopholes and footnotes and definitional evasions than an Enron 10K... I'd say that Microsoft's scaled-up lobbying activity bore fruit! It's one thing to cut a weak deal when you are unsure of your chances prior to trial (as the Government did in their first pass at MS, oh so many years ago)... but cutting a sweetheart deal after a unanimous appeals court victory is nearly unprecedented.