Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (158644)	2/13/2002 2:01:37 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

wbmw, People have refuted this claim of yours dozens of times on this thread, yet you continue to lie about it time and time again. You are incorrigible. How has the claim been refuted? You can reasonably say that the problem is not caused by Intel, but by 3rd party graphics card makers, who did not fully follow the spec of AGP and a user who does not follow specs / instructions. But the result can be the same - dead Intel motherboard. People have refuted this claim of yours dozens of times on this thread, yet you continue to lie about it time and time again. You are incorrigible. You seem a bit upset. Is it only accusation against Intel that upset you, or are you in search for truth in general? I didn't see you inquire about Windsock's claim. Will you call him a liar as well if he can't prove his claim, his claim is proven wrong, or if it is proven that whatever the problem is, is not AMD's fault? Joe

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (158644)	2/13/2002 2:29:17 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>People have refuted this claim of yours dozens of times on this thread, yet you continue to lie about it time and time again. You are incorrigible. Question, however- is he right about the "one card/ one driver fix"? If he is, then Windsock and PE are just as guilty as he is. -Z