SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (159473)2/20/2002 3:29:36 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: the Pentium 4 still wins in the majority of the benchmarks.

The .13 2200 P4 is ahead in 18 benchmarks.
The .18 2000 Athlon is ahead in 11 benchmarks.

3 of P4's "wins" consisted of 3 runs of 3DSMax 4.26 (while Athlon won the 4th run).

Note also that "This benchmark is also taken from Intel Pentium 4 Application Launcher, just like Ligos GoMotion Video Decoder, Premiere with Ligos, Windows Media Encoder 7.0 and NaturallySpeaking Pref 4.0."

Why not let AMD pick a few of the benchmarks?

A 2000 vs. a 2000 would probably have the Athlon ahead.

AMD will be launching its own .13 chips very soon.

AMD's chips cost AMD much less to produce, so AMD is able to sell its chips for less.

AMD has 2 new processes coming out this year (.13 and .13 SOI), and a major new generation (Hammer) that will update and replace the current Athlon architecture - also this year.

We've already seen every significant new thing Intel will have to offer for a long, long, time. SMT technology will help some on optimized applications, but actually slow down the installed base of software. McKinley, if it's only 50% faster than Itanium is now, will continue to be a sad joke.

Whatever good news was coming from Intel is now out and the market seems to be selling on the news.

AMD has major new advances scheduled all year long - .13 Athlon, followed by .13/SOI Athlon followed by 64-bit Hammer.