Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (31786)	2/21/2002 3:07:38 PM
From: Oral Roberts	Respond to of 99280

My mother in the family trust held ENE from 85 to still owning whatever it is now. Some things just can't be comprehended.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (31786)	2/21/2002 3:12:38 PM
From: vampire	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Gotcha i can feel that person's pain though - i own some RDRT "traders" from the 6's

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (31786)	2/21/2002 3:18:02 PM
From: jjstingray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

Zeev, do you see any bounces in here, or do we head straight to 1650?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (31786)	2/21/2002 3:21:00 PM
From: TIG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

As a lurker who usually sucks with trading, for me, if NAZ is going to have a REAL bull market, QCOM has to crash first before NAZ can do that. QCOM is a *religion*, incited by the pipe dream of George Gilder to an extremely obscene level. I have never seen an stock so much loved, revered, worshiped, defended. QCOM is not a bad company, I like it to an extent, but I never want to own a stock with such a ferverish following. It is like Chairman Mao's little redbook, unless it get tossed first, we are not going to see a real healthy market. Of course, the only thing most close to a QCOM following is the "Turnips" following<g>, which I am an active member.