Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (230145)	2/22/2002 5:43:27 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

You know what you did. It is precisely as I have described. You deliberately omitted material that would have denied you the opportunity to score a point off of me and my source. No, you endlessly obfuscate, trying to claim the high ground. If CNN made a mistake in its comments on lethality, you could point that out. However, you should have mentioned the comments, since it would have demonstrated that you had no case against me or my source. Similarly, even if the final determination were that it was potassium ferrocyanide (and, in the article, that was not asserted), if you had noticed that the police were the source of the assertion that it was potassium cyanide, or that there was a lingering confusion, again, you would have had no point to make against me or my source. In sum, you constructed, by selective quotation, that is, false representation, a slam against me and my source. That is the problem. If you wanted to make a case against the likelihood of a massacre, that would be a wholly seperate issue. It is not the issue. You are trying to make it the issue. The issue is misrepresenting the state of information to slam my source, and me for using it....