SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160035)2/25/2002 11:15:14 AM
From: Charles Gryba  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
wbmw, I just read the article. Wow, your post made it sound like the XP was dead in the water but as it turns out I counted more than 50% wins for the XP 2000+ vs the P4 2000A @ 533 and even some wins against the 2200A and 2400a @ 533. Of course you did not expect the 2000+ to beat a 2.6Ghz P4 @ 533 did you? If I were you I would re-examine the article and see that the P4 is the loser when compared to a similar rated Athlon XP.

C



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160035)2/25/2002 1:07:26 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Beamer - Re: ". Our benchmark results clearly prove that if Intel changes the FSB and memory clocks (to 133 MHz and 533 MHz, respectively), this will put it quite a distance ahead of its competition from AMD, "

If MAD lowers their prices enough, they can still claim to be the price/performance leader !

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News