Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160039)	2/25/2002 12:07:05 PM
From: rudedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

wbmw - it looks to me like the results show that increasing the Athlon clock speed (however it is done) will not yield a proportional increase in performance due to the memory limitations. So how could the .13u process help unless other changes are made?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (160039)	2/25/2002 12:35:44 PM
From: andreas_wonisch	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Wanna_bmw, Re: Neither the 2000A nor 2200A were using the faster 533MHz bus or memory. Only the 2400A and higher speeds. Great article: Let's compare a Pentium 4 that doesn't exist coupled with a motherboard that doesn't exist, overclock both and compare them to a regularly available Athlon XP 2000+. This Voelkel guy must really be a genius at benchmarking. BTW, according to c't the Tehama-E won't support 533 MHz RDRAM at all, only a 133 MHz FSB. Andreas