Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Pitera who wrote (33488)	2/26/2002 11:37:55 AM
From: Steve Lee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Myself and Zeev were both in VLNC on the way up a couple of years ago. We also took profits and didn't participate in the subsequent slide. These trades were posted on a thread that had "Channelling Thread" in the title so it was pretty clear the buying was not a long term buy and hold type deal. It was also noted that there were going concern issues back then so it's not like things have changed and we made a mistake. It was just trading. "If you had a post from 3 months ago where someone was heavily pumping VLNC to 65". How about earlier this month when it was touted as a $100 stock by Wolanchuk who Johnson thinks is a great predictor?

To: John Pitera who wrote (33488)	2/26/2002 1:35:47 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

John, I see that Mark is bringing back my call of February 2000, he forgets that less than a month or two later, I warned everyone that a breach of $26 on VLNC would lead first to $22 than to $15 and then who knows where. Actually, few days after that, VLNC gaped down and I got out, (bruised a little from $27 to $24 and change), but he must still have been hopping for $65. Partial citations of a record is nothing but a lie, and in that respect, Mr Johnson is simply a liar. Just don't respond to him as most people on this thread. Zeev