Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (160401)	2/27/2002 9:21:22 AM
From: cordob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

No Droids commented on AMD's THEFT - OK I'll bite. Who is this Saifun who seems to be on a fishing expedition, what is the IP which was stolen etc etc. Innocent until proven guilty, seems a good idea. If Intel did this, the Droids would have had Intel tried, convicted and sentenced to death !!! Intel would have been dead a few times imo. See for example the Intergraph case (coming for damages in july this year, requested damages over $ 3 Billion) Cheers Cor

To: Paul Engel who wrote (160401)	2/27/2002 3:34:41 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul re: No Droids commented on AMD's THEFT - If Intel did this, the Droids would have had Intel tried, convicted and sentenced to death !!! glad that you asked :-)) 1) the case was filed which, by itself, does not say much until the facts and rulings are out. Intel routinely sue everyone and everything and almost never wins. 2) did you forget the alpha deal, when intel examined alpha chips and incorporated the technology in pentiums. The case was settled out of the court against intel. Short memory?