SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (1804)2/27/2002 5:33:51 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 3602
 
14 Global Crossing Insiders Sold Stock

$482 Million in Shares Unloaded in 2 Years
By Christopher Stern
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 27, 2002; Page E01

During 2000 and 2001, a period when Global Crossing Ltd.'s stock was falling along with demand for its international telecommunications network, 14 company insiders sold more than $482 million worth of shares in the firm.

Global Crossing chairman and founder Gary Winnick reaped the biggest gains over those two years -- a total of more than $280 million, according to figures provided by Thomson Financial/Lancer Analytics. Winnick's windfall includes $149.2 million worth of stock sold by Pacific Capital Group, a Beverly Hills, Calif., investment firm he controls.

Winnick and other company officials have defended the sales, saying the transactions were fully disclosed to investors and others as part of Global Crossing's routine reports to federal regulators.

But the sales were made during a period now under scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the FBI. The agencies are looking into charges that the company, which filed for bankruptcy protection last month, reported inflated revenue numbers in an effort to mislead investors, creditors and regulators about its financial condition.

In a statement released by his attorney, a former Global Crossing vice president for finance, Roy Olofson, claimed officials refused to lower projections for the company's performance in June 2001 because it would raise concerns about Winnick's decision to sell $124 million worth of stock the previous month.

In all, Winnick sold $734 million of Global Crossing shares since the company went public in August 1998. During the two-year period when he sold $280 million of that total, more than a dozen other Global Crossing executives sold $200 million worth of stock. It was a time when the company's financial condition was rapidly deteriorating.

The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January. Under a deal proposed as part of that filing, Global Crossing's assets would be sold to two Asian companies for $750 million -- rendering worthless current shareholders' stock. Some shareholders are opposing the deal in hopes a higher bidder will emerge.

If a sale goes through, it would bring a sudden end to a company that went public less than three years ago and whose stock was briefly valued at more than $50 billion -- making it bigger, at least on paper, than General Motors Corp. Global Crossing was able to quickly build itself into one of the world's biggest telecommunications firms by laying high-capacity fiber-optic cables between North America, South America, Europe and Asia.

Along the way, Global Crossing became a powerful player in Washington, where it was among the biggest campaign contributors to both Democrats and Republicans. Former president George H.W. Bush was given shares eventually worth millions of dollars in return for making a speech on behalf of the company. Democratic Party Chairman Terry McAuliffe has made up to $18 million selling shares in the company he received before it went public.

At the same time that Washington insiders were receiving shares in the company, Global Crossing was seeking favorable treatment from regulators and was also competing for lucrative government contracts.

But the company eventually failed when a scarcity of international capacity turned into a glut, leading to a collapse in the market for transporting data and voice communications around the world.

As the downturn began, David Lee, a founder of Global Crossing who left the company in 2000, sold $39.9 million in stock in April of that year. At the same time, Barry Porter, former senior vice president for corporate development, sold $41.2 million worth of shares. William Carter, president of a subsidiary, Global Crossing Development Co., sold almost $22 million worth of stock in several transactions during the past two years.

"To the best of our knowledge, all of the Global Crossing individuals covered by . . . the SEC's trading rules have made their trades in accordance with SEC policies that prohibit trading when individuals have material, nonpublic information -- and have had those trades approved internally by the company's general counsel," Global Crossing spokeswoman Becky Yeamans said.

Yeamans added that there were no trades by Global Crossing executives after May of last year, in the months leading up to company's bankruptcy filing.

Some analysts say the insider sales suggest company officials may not have been confident about Global Crossing's future, particularly as the field filled with competitors and weaker players began falling by the wayside.

"These guys must have understood what was going on in the marketplace and started to unload their shares," said David Neil, vice president at the Gartner Group, a research and consulting firm.

The glut developed after Global Crossing had built up more than $12 billion in debt in less than three years. In addition to constructing a 100,000-mile network, the company used its stock as currency to acquire other telecommunications firms.

As the telecommunications market was softening, Global Crossing and other companies, including Enron Corp., which operated its own fiber-optic network, began trading capacity on each other's systems. The companies boosted their revenue by claiming income from the trades, even though in many cases the deals included capacity swaps of equal value, according to Olofson and some analysts.

Company officials have defended the deals, saying the trades represented an effective way to extend the reach of their networks. Instead of laying their own telecommunications lines, a company could simply trade or buy capacity on an existing system.

A Global Crossing subsidiary, Asia Global Crossing, said last night it had retained an attorney to investigate Olofson's charges. The company said it could not release a final financial statement for the fourth quarter and for the full year until the investigation was complete.

Global Crossing, in also releasing a partial financial statement for the fourth quarter last night, disclosed that its accounting treatment of capacity swaps is under investigation by the U.S. attorney's office for the Central District of California as well as the SEC. The company said it would release a complete financial statement when it files its 10-K annual report with the SEC.

Meanwhile, some investors and creditors have begun to raise questions about the company's proposal to sell its assets to two Asian companies, Hutchison Whampoa and Singapore Technologies Telemedia Pte.

Winnick negotiated the proposed sale before the company filed for bankruptcy and he presented the agreement to creditors and investors as a prepackaged deal. Some creditors are concerned the deal was struck after Winnick invested in another Asian company, K1 Ventures Ltd., which has indirect ties to Singapore Technologies.

Winnick has denied that his investment in K1 would in any way benefit from Singapore Technologies' purchase of Global Crossing's assets.

Staff researcher Richard Drezen contributed to this report.

___________________

btw KLP, I'm not sure on the Enron numbers...will have to do some checking.

Global Crossing has had a HUGE meltdown too and I hope The Justice Dept. and The SEC aggressively investigate what went on and if it truly was legal.



To: KLP who wrote (1804)2/27/2002 6:04:05 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
U.S. Weighs Immunity for Enron Officials' Testimony

By Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 27, 2002; Page A06

The Justice Department is evaluating offers of cooperation from several former Enron employees who may be knowledgeable about the controversial off-the-books partnerships that contributed to the company's demise, sources familiar with the investigation said.

A number of former employees, including some who worked with Andrew S. Fastow, Enron's chief financial officer and architect of the partnerships, have sought to become witnesses in exchange for immunity from prosecution, the sources said. Prosecutors have not accepted any of those overtures, the sources said.

Among those who offered information to the government is former Enron treasurer Ben F. Glisan, who could provide important evidence. Glisan worked closely with Fastow to devise deals between the partnerships and Enron, and Glisan had a secret stake in one partnership that made him $1 million on a $5,800 investment.

While prosecutors have not entered into negotiations with Glisan, sources said, Justice Department officials have asked congressional investigators to refrain from calling him as a witness in their own investigation of the Enron bankruptcy. Congressional aides routinely confer with the department about witnesses, and Glisan is so far the only one Justice has asked them to not call.

Prosecutors are focused on selecting the right witnesses to guide them through Enron's complex partnership deals. They are likely to offer immunity or plea deals to some people in exchange for information and testimony. Of central interest are the roles of Fastow, former chairman Kenneth L. Lay and former chief executive Jeffrey K. Skilling.

Calling a witness before Congress could complicate the government's use of him or her as a cooperating witness down the road. If witnesses were to cite their constitutional right against self-incrimination and refuse to testify, that might later tarnish them in the eyes of a jury. Equally worrisome to prosecutors is having a witness's congressional testimony undercut by more fully developed information that surfaces in the course of the criminal probe.

Preserving the viability of potential cooperating witnesses is especially important in the Enron investigation, lawyers involved in the case said. It could be difficult to bring charges against any Enron officials without the help of company insiders because defense lawyers will be able to cite approvals of the partnership deals by legal and accounting professionals.

Capitol Hill aides confirmed that the Justice Department has asked them not to call Glisan as a witness. "We have had discussions with the Justice Department about Mr. Glisan, but I can't comment on those talks because there is an ongoing criminal investigation," said Ken Johnson, a spokesman for the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. "While we believe Mr. Glisan has vitally important information, we have not offered him immunity to testify before our committee."

Prosecutors may be especially dependent on Enron officials to determine whether there is a case to be made against Skilling, since he does not appear to have been a party to the self-dealing from the partnerships that Fastow and members of his team engaged in. Skilling has told Congress he believed that the partnerships served a legitimate purpose in helping Enron manage cash flow. He has disputed the contention they were created to conceal debt and pump up the value of the company's stock.

At the same time federal investigators are seeking to develop their cases, Congress is determined to conduct its own probe. Some key Enron players have refused to testify, among them Fastow and three people who worked with him in his division, Enron Global Finance: division vice president Michael Kopper, chief accounting officer Richard Causey and chief risk officer Richard Buy.

Fastow's attorney, John Keker, is known for his ability as a trial lawyer rather than as a dealmaker. Keker did not return calls for comment on his client's status with the Justice Department. Kopper's attorney had no comment.

Sherron Watkins, the Enron vice president who warned then-chairman Lay that Enron was in danger of imploding in a "wave of accounting scandals," has been formally told she is not a target in the Justice probe. Watkins has testified twice before Congress, including an appearance yesterday before the Senate Commerce Committee panel.

A law enforcement source said Watkins asked for and received a "non-target letter" from prosecutors. In testimony, she has acknowledged selling Enron stock after she became aware of the company's accounting irregularities, which could be viewed as insider trading by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Justice Department and regulators are also investigating Enron's accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, for its role the company's collapse and for the shredding of Enron documents as the company's troubles came to the attention of authorities last fall.

David B. Duncan, who was Andersen's lead auditor on the Enron account, has met twice with the Justice Department's Enron task force. So far he has not entered into any deal with prosecutors. His lawyer, Robert Giuffra Jr., said prosecutors are evaluating Duncan's credibility while deciding whether to enter into a cooperation agreement with him.

"It's unlikely they will do any deals for months," he said.

An article in yesterday's New York Times said Glisan is "cooperating" and providing investigators with "information and evidence," though it noted that no "final decision" had been made about a deal. Some defense lawyers said that revelation could cause other potential cooperating witnesses to rush into the arms of prosecutors. "It's just a shakedown," one said.

Law enforcement officials confirmed that Glisan and his attorney, Washington lawyer Henry Schuelke, have offered information, as have a number of other Enron employees who could face charges. But the department is in a "holding pattern" on making any deals. Schuelke was unavailable for comment.

Glisan was briefly interviewed by lawyers who conducted an investigation for Enron's board of directors. He was named Enron's treasurer in the spring of 2000, succeeding Jeffrey McMahon, who moved on after complaining that the job was rife with conflicts of interest.

An investigation commissioned by Enron's board after the company's collapse found that Glisan was a central participant in two huge partnership transactions that required the company to dramatically restate its earnings last fall.

Glisan and lawyer Kristina Mordaunt earned $1 million each on their $5,800 investments in Southhampton Place, an Enron-affiliated partnership, as did three other officials in the global finance unit, the report said.

© 2002 The Washington Post Company

__________________________

KLP, my hunch is the head Justice Dept. Prosecuter (from San Francisco) is not fooling around...she and her team are quickly moving up the food chain at Enron and it seems like Mr. Glisan could become a star witness. My hunch is she is methodically putting together a case against the top execs at Enron (Lay, Skilling, Fastow, and possibly others)....I sure wouldn't bet against her -- she has successfully prosecuted high profile white collar criminals and mafia bosses before. The stakes are higher here. Corporate America will be watching what happens to the former Enron Execs. If they are guilty of breaking the laws, then they should pay a big price.

-Scott



To: KLP who wrote (1804)2/27/2002 10:31:37 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3602
 
Skilling's Sequel: Clueless

By Lorraine Woellert
BusinessWeek Online
Daily Briefing: REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK
Wednesday February 27, 7:57 am Eastern Time

Jeffrey Skilling has clearly learned a thing or two since his last visit to Congress. After a smoldering appearance before a House committee on Jan. 29, during which the former Enron CEO mostly sat in silence through a day of verbal flogging, Skilling came out swinging on Feb. 26.

Testifying before the Senate Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs Committee, Skilling was aggressive, interrupting several senators, questioning their assumptions, their analogies, their abilities, even challenging the veracity of a few lawmakers. In between, with the help of his lawyer, he doggedly defended himself against charges of wrongdoing.

For a man with a reputation as quick on his feet, it struck several senators as odd, indeed incomprehensible, that Skilling, with his Harvard MBA and savvy business background, never caught a whiff that something was rotten at Enron. ``You're very smart,'' noted Senator Barbara Boxer [D-Calif.]. ``That's why I don't believe you.''

CEO SANDWICH. This was a made-for-the-cameras hearing. The banking panel sat Skilling between Enron's top whistle blower, Vice-President Sherron Watkins, and a man whose testimony Skilling continues to challenge, former Enron Treasurer -- now President -- Jeff McMahon. It was quite a picture: The former CEO sandwiched between a pair of surviving Enron execs who have questioned his account of the circumstances leading up to energy giant's collapse.

The trio turned the hearing into five hours of ``he said, he said, and she said.'' Skilling stared intently at Watkins during her opening statement, almost seeming to be glaring at her. But when it was his turn to speak, he never took her on directly. Instead, he blamed his accountants, blamed his subordinates, blamed the financial system, then blamed his accountants again for failing to alert him to Enron's troubles.

While Watkins was sympathetic to ex-Enron CEO Ken Lay when she first appeared before Congress earlier this month, this time she placed at least some of the blame for Enron's collapse on Skilling's predecessor for failing to save the company when he had a chance. The low-key McMahon wouldn't be drawn into the blame game but did admit that his $1.5 million retention bonus ``probably wasn't necessary.''

LEAKY MEMORY. A corporate honcho who doesn't need huge sums of money to do his job -- and admits it? The moment of candor caught the entire room off-guard, even prompting Senator Peter Fitzgerald [R-Ill.] to apologize to McMahon for having to bring it up in the first place. Watkins, who received no such retention bonus, remained silent during the exchange.

So what did Congress learn from the latest Enron testimony? Mostly, that for such a highly paid and reputedly savvy CEO, Skilling seemed awfully clueless.

He couldn't recall whether he had received $5.6 million in bonuses in 2000. He doesn't know how much Enron stock he sold in 1999 and 2000, while he was talking up the company's shares to its workers. He didn't know that the Raptors entities were backed with $700 million in Enron stock. He didn't know the off-the-books Chewco was undercapitalized.

He didn't know former Enron CFO Andrew Fastow was raking in tens of millions of dollars from his LJM partnerships. He didn't know that former Enron Treasurer Ben F. Glisan Jr. had a stake in some of those same deals. He didn't know how many subsidiaries Enron had in offshore tax havens [all he did say was that it wasn't that many]. He didn't recall when Wall Street analysts began questioning Enron's earnings. At one point, an exasperated Senator Ron Wyden [D-Ore.] declared: ``I'm not clear what you spent your time on.''

GOOD SHOW. So what did Skilling know? That Enron never had a problem on his watch. That the company was ``illiquid,'' not insolvent. That everything would have been just fine if creditors had just given the company a couple months. And that his mentor, Ken Lay, ``doesn't deserve prison'' for whatever his role might -- or might not -- have been in last year's California energy crisis.

``I don't know if we've gotten much closer to the truth today,'' Senator Byron L. Dorgan [D-N.D.] said at the end of the session. But that has never stopped Congress from putting on a good show. And the committee has four more hearings to go.