SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (44938)2/27/2002 3:41:56 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I dislike the idea of genetic manipulation intensely. I think of "Brave New World" as an example of what can come of it. On the other hand, I have no objection to eliminating actual genetic diseases. (The method of creating a number of embryos and screening them, with most to end in the trash, I object to). It seems to me that the ethical rule has to be that such genetic manipulation is only used against recognizable diseases. However, the genie is out of the bottle. Someone rich enough will get a designer baby. Repugnant though it might be, at least it will limit the potential for widespread social ramifications......



To: The Philosopher who wrote (44938)2/27/2002 4:11:14 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Its not just a designer baby issue, its apparently an issue of creating multiple embryos with the plan to kill all but one as part of the screening. Of course this isn't rare any more, but that bothers me more then the designer baby aspect.

Tim